In all fairness, I don't think re-opening the discussion (when we had
set aside a whole week for everyone to do it) is a prudent thing to
do. (01)
We are supposedly in the middle of the voting process already, and we
should only be seeing: (A), (B) or abstain responses. (02)
If some of you feel strongly enough about it, one could even make a
motion to put the current voting process on hold and re-open the
matter for discussion. (03)
However, I don't think we are here to arbitrate Robert's (or
whoever's) Ruel of Order, but rather to accomplish what we have set
out as our mission on 3-Jan-2008 (ref.
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository#nid17YN
) ... and hence my remark about re-opening the discussion in my first
line of this message. (04)
Regards. =ppy
-- (05)
On Feb 6, 2008 10:50 AM, <dbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Duane,
>
> I'm happy to vote for a definition that is a little less ambiguous than (A) if
> someone will propose one. But, I'm not sure where we are in Peter's
>timelines.
>
> Peter,
>
> If we adopt definition (A), can we revisit it later in the discussion as the
> conversations and details are addressed?
>
>
> Best regards,
> Denise
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
> Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository
> (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository (07)
|