To: | Ontology Summit 2012 discussion <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | joseph simpson <jjs0sbw@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:07:05 -0700 |
Message-id: | <CAPnyebzBzpF6Kfa7rme8iiFU+_7qJD0w0v76Ed+Xo8VfnyqQHQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Interesting point. How would you know if a web site used an ontology to support the design of a web site? If you used an ontology to support the design of a web site does the ontology have to be documented and published? If the ontology that was used to support the web site design is documented and published, does it have to be accepted by any group? In fact, it would be good if you published an ontology about how to use email to show that ontology development is a value added activity and using an ontology is the way to go. So we would need an ontology for the email discussion about the ontology for the web site development about ontology development. It is intuitively obvious that this may be ........ counter productive..... Have fun, Joe On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Ramayya, Venkata V <venkata.v.ramayya@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-- Joe Simpson Sent From My DROID!! _________________________________________________________________ Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012 Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontology-summit] Summit Website, Brand Niemann |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontology-summit] Thanks for a very successful Ontology Summit 2012 and Symposium!, Paul Hofmann |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontology-summit] Summit Website, jerrylsmit@xxxxxxx |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontology-summit] Summit Website, Daniel Schwabe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |