On 12/15/2010 1:03 PM, David Price wrote:
> Perhaps John and others are unaware of the failure of XMI
> for UML tools? I was shocked myself as I tried moving/processing
> UML/SysML models. At the OMG meeting where the model interchange group
> got started I made the statement that 'XMI is a complete failure in
> industry' and nobody, not even the UML vendors, could disagree. It's
> OMG's dirty little secret I guess. (01)
Yes. XMI was a disaster for one very simple reason: they got lost
in a huge syntactic mess onto which they piled a monstrous list of
vaguely specified requirements that buried the underlying logic and
ontology in a huge mess of garbage. (02)
John (03)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (04)
|