|From:||Simon Spero <sesuncedu@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:25:34 -0500|
On Nov 25, 2014 1:40 PM, "John F Sowa" <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> All those points are important.
These points may be important, but as much as I love The Worm (and despise zebrafish), they do seem to be somewhat separate from issues of applied ontology.
But fear not, Worm fans; there exist more Elegans weapons, from more civilized times - eg.
The Worm phenotype ontology: http://www.obofoundry.org/cgi-bin/detail.cgi?id=worm_phenotype
Models of neural networks that have such classically simplified neurons are used for different purposes than the models used in simulations.
The following book series may be of interest:
Ontologies for computational neuroscience may be found here:
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Sabotaging a communication system is not a new idea, Rich Cooper|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Sabotaging a communication system is not a new idea, John Bottoms|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Sabotaging a communication system is not a new idea, John F Sowa|
|Next by Thread:||[ontolog-forum] Probabilistic ontology (was Re: Sabotaging a communication system is not a new idea), Simon Spero|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|