|From:||Simon Spero <sesuncedu@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Sun, 16 Nov 2014 11:12:52 -0500|
Since this is a forum for discussing ontology, I assume that this was an allusion to GMU work on probabilistic reasoning with ontologies, such as
With code at:
These approaches are designed to classify with partial information and active disinformation.
These can help you get a feel for what it is like to be like to be a bat whose sensor channels are being jammed (not communications channels).
[OT: Designing secure systems has always been about balancing the costs to Alice and Bob with the benefits and costs to Eve and Mallet, and the resources that they have available. Making the costs of attacking one part of the system higher may leave another part of the system the most vulnerable target.
On Nov 16, 2014 7:02 AM, "John F Sowa" <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Note the following article:
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Sabotaging a communication system is not a new idea, Rich Cooper|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Sabotaging a communication system is not a new idea, sowa|
|Previous by Thread:||[ontolog-forum] Sabotaging a communication system is not a new idea, John F Sowa|
|Next by Thread:||[ontolog-forum] Wednesday's DCMI webinar on Learning Resource Metadata Initiative (LRMI), DCMI Announce|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|