To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:12:13 -0500 (EST) |
Message-id: | <f6db88a19e6bb33ef7da7d38eef08a82.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Rich, That's true.
> Other creatures also jam, avoid jamming, and Unfortunately, the Arpanet protocols were designed in the 1960s by academics who had no experience with such issues. The WWW was also designed for free sharing among academics who had no experience with such issues. When we talk about ontologies for networks, it might be a good idea to consider them. John _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
Previous by Date: | [ontolog-forum] Probabilistic ontology (was Re: Sabotaging a communication system is not a new idea), Simon Spero |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Sabotaging a communication system is not a new idea, Rich Cooper |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Sabotaging a communication system is not a new idea, Rich Cooper |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Sabotaging a communication system is not a new idea, Rich Cooper |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |