On 2/6/14 4:42 PM, Duane Nickull wrote:
> On top of that, there are many shortcomings of XML and XML schema that
> need to be prescriptively described within the XML processing model.
The XML schema description language (XSD) certainly has many
shortcomings, but there are other options, especially Relax NG, NVDL and
Schematron (http://dsdl.org/), all supported by tools like oXygen
(http://oxygenxml.com) (01)
Contrast that to the validation support for JSON - well, basically you
have http://json-schema.org/ which only supports non-recursive
structures, generic platforms like ANTLR, or write your own
(http://json-ld.org/playground/). Take a look at the JSON-LD "Grammar"
http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#json-ld-grammar. The very idea of schemas
for JSON is anathema to many JSON users, so don't expect much support
from the community for this. (02)
Tara (03)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (04)
|