ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] fitness of XML for ontology

To: <tara_athan@xxxxxxxxxx>, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Duane Nickull <duane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 09:31:14 -0800
Message-id: <CF1A5828.2C7963%duane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 2014-02-07 4:03 AM, "Tara Athan" <taraathan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:    (01)

>On 2/6/14 4:42 PM, Duane Nickull wrote:
>> On top of that, there are many shortcomings of XML and XML schema that
>> need to be prescriptively described within the XML processing model.
>The XML schema description language (XSD) certainly has many
>shortcomings, but there are other options, especially Relax NG, NVDL and
>Schematron (http://dsdl.org/), all supported by tools like oXygen
>(http://oxygenxml.com)    (02)

DN:  I love RelaxNG (Thank you David RR Webber!).  The issues are common
with that schema language too however.    (03)

Duane    (04)



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (05)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>