[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontological issues relative to privacy.

To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: John McClure <jmcclure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 07:53:54 -0800
Message-id: <52DE9812.9030204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Patrick - redacting patient PII (personally identifiable info) I'd 
think should be adequate safeguard of medical privacy while providing 
the info needed to evaluate doctors' performance. Which suggests a class 
of data -- redacted records -- for which one can state their 
expectations and or permissions..... Thanks/jmc    (01)

On 1/21/2014 6:31 AM, Patrick Durusau wrote:
> You do realize that the average person's medical records are of no
> interest other than to them, their doctor and perhaps the insurance
> company? The only reason for pushing patient privacy is to prevent
> effective review of medical practice on a physician by physician basis.
> It is the physician who is being protected, not the patient.    (02)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (03)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>