| 
On 7/9/12 2:16 AM, John F Sowa wrote:
> On 7/8/2012 4:43 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> I think we call all use the URI as a common foundation for broad
>> agreement re. data access, integration, and representation :-)
> The big advance was the instant, universal, world-wide availability
> of data everywhere.    (01)
Yes.    (02)
> But there's nothing new about having universal
> identifiers.    (03)
I agree.
> We've had universal identifiers for chemical compounds
> and postal addresses for over a century.    (04)
Yes, we do, not in dispute.    (05)
>    Social-security numbers
> for people aren't new.  ISBN numbers for books have been around
> for a while.  Every major profession and business designed universal
> identifiers for their subject matter.    (06)
Ditto.    (07)
>
> But word senses are still a research area.  Professional
> lexicographers have no clue about how to agree on a universal
> set of word senses.  Every dictionary has a different selection.    (08)
Yes.    (09)
>
> Note the following article by Adam Kilgarriff, who has done
> a great deal of R & D on processing large corpora of documents:
>
>       http://arxiv.org/pdf/cmp-lg/9712006.pdf
>       "I don't believe in word senses"
>
> He's not the only one.  The linguist Alan Cruse coined the term
> 'microsense' for the fine distinctions of meaning in each context.
> I talk about that in slides 12 to 20 of the following:
>
>      http://www.jfsowa.com/talks/dynolang.pdf
>
> For all practical purposes, Kilgarriff's doubts about word senses
> are equivalent to Cruse's claim that there are infinitely many.    (010)
Yes.    (011)
>
> Note that Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft abandoned URIs.    (012)
If that's true, they are making a *serious mistake*. Basically, they are 
veering away from the point you made earlier: "The big advance was the 
instant, universal, world-wide availability of data everywhere."    (013)
URIs, as per TimBL's Linked Data meme, really provide super keys for 
data objects that operate at InterWeb-scale.    (014)
Beyond data access, they are also missing the opportunity to leverage 
inverse functional property semantics which is a powerful data 
integration mechanism (re. co-references derived from reasoning)  that 
Linked Data showcases today.    (015)
>   For their
> schema.org, they just use ordinary character strings that look
> a lot like ordinary words and word phrases:
>
>      http://www.schema.org/docs/full.html
>
> If I had to choose between the W3C vs Kilgarriff, Cruse, Google,
> Yahoo, and Microsoft, I would not hesitate in making my bet.    (016)
I never bet against the power and ingenuity inherent in URIs. That's 
something I'll never do in the realm of data access, integration, and 
management.    (017)
Links:    (018)
1. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWDPhEvKuRY&feature=player_detailpage#t=499s 
-- Ted Nelson acknowledging virtues of URIs
2. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#InverseFunctionalProperty-def -- 
owl:inverseFunctionalProperty
3. http://bit.ly/MaKRBU -- list of inverseFunctionalProperty entity 
types from the LOD cloud cache we maintain  .    (019)
>
> John
>   
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
>   
>
>    (020)
--     (021)
Regards,    (022)
Kingsley Idehen 
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen    (023)
  smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
 
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (01)
 |