To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:21:07 -0400 (EDT) |
Message-id: | <578abc32000ac8817d0c20d756d17c3e.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Azamat, The words 'tangible' and 'intangible' do not admit gradations of variability. There is nothing semi-tangible or almost intangible. > so it looks more intangible than tangible. No. There are many physical things that are very hard to detect: atoms, quarks, Higgs boson, neutrinos, etc. But that does not make them intangible. Anything that has any observable effects of any kind is tangible. And dark matter has huge effects: it changes the way matter in galaxies and even intergalactic space is distributed. John _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] intangibles (was RE: Why most classifications are fuzzy), Christopher Menzel |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] intangibles (was RE: Why most classifications are fuzzy), sowa |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] intangibles: Semantic World, AzamatAbdoullaev |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] intangibles (was RE: Why most classifications are fuzzy), Avril Styrman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |