Tuesday, July 26, 2011 10:50 PM, Doug Foxvog wrote: "The concepts of dark
matter and dark energy are only useful at a galactic
> or wider scale of space & periods of time in the millions or billions of
> years. For 99.9999% of uses of ontologies, they can be ignored".
It's quite opposite for universal ontology, 99.9999% of uses; for the dark
matter/energy are samples of intangible substances, potentially infinite
time and space are samples of infinity and eternity.
With the rest we agree.
Azamat (01)
----- Original Message -----
From: "doug foxvog" <doug@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 10:50 PM
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] intangibles (was RE: Why most classifications
are fuzzy) (02)
> On Tue, July 26, 2011 13:52, AzamatAbdoullaev said:
>
>> Re the physical law: the criteria of physical reality or material
>> existence is having a causal effect (or a feedback effect) upon physical
>> things, directly or indirectly. Thus we conclude on the materiality of
>> physical forces, radiations, magnetic/electric fields, ect. What really
>> exists as effecting on visible matter or radiation, but can't be
>> detected directly, is very elusive, like dark matter and dark energy,
>> today constituting 95% of the universe, and needing new/modified
>> physical/gravitational laws.
>
> The concepts of dark matter and dark energy are only useful at a galactic
> or wider scale of space & periods of time in the millions or billions of
> years. For 99.9999% of uses of ontologies, they can be ignored.
>
> Note that although the theory of relativity necessitated the modification
> of Newton's laws of motion and the statement of new laws, Newton's laws
> remain perfectly valid in the vast majority of cases dealing with movement
> of physical objects on the Earth.
>
> Yes, relativistic physical laws do not predict observations at super-
> galactic scales. Extending gravitational fields on such scales using the
> same laws and assuming that supernovae distant in time and space operate
> identically with nearby comparatively recent ones is inconsistent with
> recent observations. Earlier, problems with the Big Bang model
> necessitated a fix in order to allow galaxies to form, so an
> "inflationary"
> period was hypothesized in which space expanded at faster than light
> speeds.
>
> It is quite possible that new theories will arise that will account for
> galactic formation, galactic rotation, and the observed distribution of
> red shifts with apparent brightness of objects that does not need dark
> energy, dark matter, and inflation as currently hypothesized.
>
> Different ontologies can model the different theories, but for most
> practical purposes, such ontologies will not be needed.
>
>> ...
>
>> Azamat
>
>
> =============================================================
> doug foxvog doug@xxxxxxxxxx http://ProgressiveAustin.org
>
> "I speak as an American to the leaders of my own nation. The great
> initiative in this war is ours. The initiative to stop it must be ours."
> - Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
> =============================================================
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> (03)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (04)
|