To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:25:56 -0400 (EDT) |
Message-id: | <864480c41a6733698d33df6e02b49bd2.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Azamat, That is true. But I wanted to emphasize the
continuity. But the same physical laws are involved. Long term predictions require deeper analysis and more complex reasoning than short term predictions. But those are different points on a continuum. John _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] intangibles (was RE: Why most classifications are fuzzy), sowa |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] intangibles (was RE: Why most classifications are fuzzy), Matthew West |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] intangibles (was RE: Why most classifications are fuzzy), doug foxvog |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] intangibles (was RE: Why most classifications are fuzzy), AzamatAbdoullaev |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |