To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Sat, 30 Jul 2011 06:39:02 -0400 (EDT) |
Message-id: | <076beaa8cb521d619e83696cc4bde543.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Azamat, You can think that, but that is not the normal way people
use those worlds. I suggest that you choose different words instead of
trying to blur important distinctions. There is a very sharp distinction between what exists in our universe and what doesn't. There is, however, a gradation of levels of confirmation for various hypotheses about what exists. I suggest that you apply the gradation to degrees of confirmation, not to degrees of existence. John _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] intangibles (was RE: Why most classifications are fuzzy), sowa |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] intangibles (was RE: Why most classifications are fuzzy), AzamatAbdoullaev |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] intangibles (was RE: Why most classifications are fuzzy), AzamatAbdoullaev |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] intangibles (was RE: Why most classifications are fuzzy), AzamatAbdoullaev |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |