On Tue, September 21, 2010 11:32, Pavithra said:
>
> Well, I understand that we are defining terms and things. But now and
> then we limit ourselves to re defining Objects etc in more traditional way
> Object Oriented way. Objects and definition of Objects the way Ferenc has
> defined looks good, however it is limited to things that have
physical
> form and attributes. But Ontology and Semantic Analysis may have to
> address other things that may not have visible physical form but exists
> and have indirect form of attributes and / or behavior.
Exactly. Limiting Objects which can be described to physical ones
greatly limits what can be stated. Along with mental constructs (such as
rules, accounts, and conceptual works), situations (which can be sub-
divided into static situations and events) need to be modeled.
Physical objects have spatio-temporal properties as well as mass. Mental
constructs have temporal properties, but neither spatial nor mass.
Situations have temporal properties and physical situations have physical
objects as physical participants. [Non-physical situations have only
non-physical participants, such as the static situation of a sick leave
account having 15 days in
it or the event of a law expiring.]
> Or we may be
> addressing the change of behavior. For example, particular form of
> illness which is not an object by itself but functioning of certain
> physical or behavioral attributes and change in condition of existing
> physical behavior..
An illness is a physical event. A "form of illness" is a subclass of
Illness, which is a subclass of Physical Event. Both the organism that
is sick and the illness are spatio-temporal things, and thus have a
location, starting time, and ending times (as well as other properties
of spatio-temporal things). The organism is also a physical object, and
thus has mass (as well as other properties of physical objects). The
illness is also an event and thus has a doer and an object acted on (as
well as other properties of events).
> Semantic Analysis has to capture such
things..
I agree.
-- doug foxvog
> --- On Tue, 9/21/10, John F. Sowa <
sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: John F. Sowa <
sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] language vs logic - ambiguity and
> startingwithdefinitions
> To:
ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tuesday, September 21, 2010, 9:31 AM
>
> On 9/21/2010 8:37 AM, Pavithra wrote:
>> In this group sometimes we write about analysis ( description and
>> describing the world in simple English), Design ( modeling ) and
>> programming languages, and creating programming languages and meta
>>
environment in the same tone.
>> That can be confusing..
>
> Life is confusing. When they're working within the paradigms of
> a particular specialty, scientists have the luxury of isolating
> some aspect of life to study under controlled conditions.
>
> But engineers have to apply science to the problems of dealing
> with all the messy aspects of the real world. They can't control
> the conditions. They have to build a bridge, dig a tunnel, or
> drill an oil well under whatever conditions nature presents.
> If necessary, they can modify those conditions, but only under
> the constraints of budgets and deadlines.
>
> This forum is addressing engineering problems that apply science
> to problems of relating language, the world, and software systems.
> We can't do much about changing language or the world, but we can
> modify the
conditions for designing, developing, and using software.
>
> So that's what we're trying to do. And it can get messy.
>
> John
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ > Config Subscr:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ > Unsubscribe: mailto:
ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Shared Files:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/> Community Wiki:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/> To join:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J> To Post: mailto:
ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/> Config Subscr:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/> Unsubscribe: mailto:
ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Shared Files:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/> Community Wiki:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/> To join:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J> To Post: mailto:
ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
=============================================================
doug foxvog
doug@xxxxxxxxxx http://ProgressiveAustin.org"I speak as an American to the leaders of my own nation. The great
initiative in this war is ours. The initiative to stop it must be ours."
- Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
=============================================================
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:
ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxShared Files:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/Community Wiki:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1JTo Post: mailto:
ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx