Patrick Cassidy wrote:
> Ron,
> Regarding your suggestion:
>
>
>> As I have suggested before, why not use the wiki to start to build the
>> case for this project.
>> The arguments for it and against it seem relatively stable..
>> The next step, in my opinion would be to start to build a scope section
>> that would identify which areas would be addressed in an initial
>> project.
>> After that, the task outline and the manpower allocation could be
>> outlined. What do the 100 people do and how do you organize it so that
>> the project can be managed? What are the interim deliverables and
>> milestone dates?
>> $30,000,000 for 100 people is $300,000 per person, so the project runs
>> for a few years.
>>
>> What is the mix of skill sets required? Infrastructure costs - people,
>> material, travel, conference attendance, etc.
>>
>> If the EU put up half and the US put up half, you are now getting down
>> into budget amounts that already have been funded for other projects.
>>
>> Ron
>>
>>
> [[PC]] That would be a good idea if there were some significant body of
> potential participants that were willing to start planning. The problem I
> foresee is that, until some funding agency actually asserts a willingness to
> seriously consider and fund a properly structured project of that kind, few
> will take it seriously enough to risk wasting time on such plans. I think
> that we first need an expression of interest from a funding agency. This
> is not entirely chicken-and-egg: a simple outline could be prepared for
> potential funders to consider, with the understanding that a more detailed
> proposal would be needed before any funding commitment was made. But if
> there is absolutely no hint of any possibility of getting funding for the
> project, even the effort to prepare a brief outline is hard to generate from
> more than a few people.
>
> Can anyone think of an agency that might consider such a project? Does
> anyone have any contacts with whom to discuss it?
>
I would think that the Justice Department would be interested since they
have a very complex investigation to do.
The people trying to draft regulations for the financial industry will
have an ongoing need for some way to handle an ever more complex set of
financial instruments and huge report processing requirements.
> I am slowly organizing a description of such a project, and the feedback
> from this forum has been very useful. But until I get some glimmer of
> interest from some potential funder, my own efforts are concentrated on
> getting a first version of the COSMO finished so that I can do some testing
> to explore the question of the number of semantic primitives needed for a
> Foundation Ontology usable to support broad semantic interoperability. If
> anyone else is interested, of course I will be happy to discuss the issue in
> detail, in a smaller group without the distracting and unhelpful diversions
> into peripheral topics.
>
>
That is where the wiki could help. Less repetitive discussion and more
written points. (01)
> Pat
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> (02)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (03)
|