To: | edbark@xxxxxxxx, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Ali Hashemi <ali.hashemi@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:54:56 -0500 |
Message-id: | <5ab1dc970901261154o2cd5b6dcl369d1237bea75fc8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Just to clarify, I was using logic as a catch-all to refer to reasoning systems (i think similar to the way Ed used it a few emails ago.) However, in an off forum email, he pointed out: Ed wrote: Category theory is a "reasoning system" in the same sense that "real analysis" or "linear Which is where my initial query came from. I guess i'm more interested in what makes something seem sensible / reasonable to another agent, and it is in this context that I appeal to an underlying "logic." Perhaps a moot point from using terms too vaguely. //Ali On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Ed Barkmeyer <edbark@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
-- (•`'·.¸(`'·.¸(•)¸.·'´)¸.·'´•) .,., _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Next steps in using ontologies as standards, Ron Wheeler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [ontolog-forum] Using the wiki [was - Re: Next steps in using ontologies as standards], Peter Yim |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Next steps in using ontologies as standards, Ed Barkmeyer |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Next steps in using ontologies as standards, Mitch Harris |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |