ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Thing and Class

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 12:14:02 -0700
Message-id: <47E645DB54C248A5BF82FB8396DE7DAA@rhm8200>
Chris
 
mKE, the program which implements mKR, enhances intelligence
by assisting a human in creating/updating/searching knowledge
bases.
 
mKR is integrating syntax and semantics without ambiguity.
 
John has happy;  implies that "happy" is an attribute.
I do walk done;  implies that "walk" is an action
        "done" is useful because "walk" may be followed
        by many optional prepositional phrases.
 
P.S.
Spanish, and several other non-English languages,
use "has" for attributes instead of "is".
"done" is used in many modern programming languages.
 
Dick McCullough
Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done;
mKE do enhance od Real Intelligence done;
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;
http://mKRmKE.org/
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Thing and Class

On Sep 13, 2008, at 9:29 AM, Richard H. McCullough wrote:
John
 
Your remarks about modal logic remind me of some features
of mKR which I tend to forget about, because I don't use them
very often.
 
mKR vocabulary includes "can".  Compare
    I do walk done;
    I can walk done;
 
mKR contexts include what people say.  Compare
    John has happy;
    Dick do say od {John has happy;} done;
The latter statement creates a new context say_Dick
which contains the embedded statement.

I'm having a hard time understanding the point mKR.  The "do" and "done" constructs are delimiters that might be necessary for parsing, but you claim that your mKR reconstructions are paraphrases of English and that using them "enhances intelligence".  Why do you think that casting sentences in a natural language that we learned at our mother's knee into a rigid canonical form (a rather awkward one at that -- "John has happy"??) enhances intelligence?  What additional clarity do you think is brought to "I walk" by the far clunkier "I do walk done"?  On the face of it, the claim is bizarre.

-chris




_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>