[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Thing and Class

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Christopher Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 13:51:38 -0500
Message-id: <ECCD3440-61C6-4082-BA6E-D301AA72BFCC@xxxxxxxx>
On Sep 13, 2008, at 10:23 AM, Richard H. McCullough wrote:
> John
> FYI, the features of mKR have been evaluated by me --
> in various applications, over the last dozen years.    (01)

And that's a good start, but I'm sure you'd admit that that is not an  
adequate vetting -- your work needs to be subjected to evaluation  
within the KR community in order for its adequacy to be objectively  
assessed.  Granted, it might be hard to get your stuff recognized  
enough to have it subjected to the sort of vetting in the first  
place.  But if you are really on to something here, then you should be  
able to show that mKR solves important problems that are currently  
either ignored or unsolved within the KR community, or at least that  
it has significant advantages over all other KR paradigms.  And the  
way to get recognized is to point those problems out and demonstrate  
mKR's solutions/advantages by publishing papers and giving  
presentations at relevant scientific meetings.  Otherwise mKR will  
languish, as KR researchers will have no reason to give it a serious  
look.    (02)

-chris    (03)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (04)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>