Paola, (01)
perhaps SweetWiki would be worth looking at:
http://www.wikisym.org/ws2006/proceedings/p69.pdf
>From the paper:
"... an ontology of the topics: each wiki page addresses one or
more topics. In order to ease navigation while maintaining the
usual simplicity, we implemented the usual tag/keyword
mechanism with a domain ontology shared by the whole wiki.
By making this topic ontology explicit we can once again
reason on it (e.g. find semantically close topics) make
complex queries (e.g. find pages tagged with close topics), we
can modify it (e.g. tidy the ontology, merge equivalent
concepts, etc.) ..." (02)
Wiki@nt is a JspWiki-based collaborative ontology editor:
http://www.cs.iastate.edu/~honavar/Papers/baoeon04.pdf (03)
or maybe SemperWiki
http://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-175/27_oren_semperwiki_final.pdf
which they say could be seen as a lightweight ontology editor. (04)
And there are others (IkeWiki for example). (05)
Regards,
Jakub (06)
paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx schrieb:
> Jackub
>
> I am aware of wikis as potential tools to support the creation of
> ontologies, but I am also aware of challenges. Do you have examples that we
> could study?
>
> PDM
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Jakub Kotowski <jakubkotowski@xxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> Paola,
>>
>>
>> paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx schrieb:
>> > However a wiki is, in my view, still primarily a 'repository', not an
>>> 'ontology'
>> wiki is not an ontology but it can be used to create one. And not only
>> in the sense that you describe the ontology on wiki pages (by copying
>> and pasting there contents of an owl file for example). There already
>> exist semantic wikis that allow one to define relationships between
>> concepts by giving a type to a link. And there's more you can do in such
>> a wiki.
>>
>> Jakub
>>
>>> As such, I am interested in understanding the relationship between the
>>> architecture of a respository (say, a wiki type of tool) and the
>> ontology
>>> itself (the repository independent part of the ontology, vocabularies,
>>> relationships and concepts, for example)
>>> In particular, I am interested in hearing about how a repository
>>> architecture may, or may not, meet the formalization requirements and
>> how it
>>> may or may not influence the contents of the ontology itself
>>>
>>> PDM
>>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
>> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
>> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (07)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (08)
|