|
At 5:00 AM +0700 4/22/08, paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Pat, Wacek and Denise,
in addition to your observations above, open is not just 'able to
read'. but also to rip, modify, repurpose, deconstruct,. and possibly
other things
Of course. If you can read a file, then you have that file in
your computer. At which point you can do anything to it you
want.
It makes sense to me to attempt to define
degrees of opennes in ontology in the same way that perhaps a gpl or
creative commons license defines what can a person do with content and
other products of the mind (attribute, reproduce, distribute,
commercialise, rip, repurpose, change, or not). If Ontology, or some
parts therof, or some versions thereof, can be considered
'intellectual property' of sorts (some people dont like that
term at all) then everything that applies to a creative commons
license or gpl is likely to apply to open ontology, and the
repositories that follow
All true, no doubt. Ontologies in that respect are just like any
other text or image. I don't mean that this issue is irrelevant, but
that there is nothing particular to ontologies as such which is
relevant here.
Pat, maybe ontologies cannot be compiled
and executed, yet, but reasoners, when properly constructed
(....) control and provide inputs to executable
programmes, right?
They can, yes. What is your point?
Pat
PDM
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Pat
Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
At 9:58 PM +0200 4/21/08, Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote:
>Pat Hayes wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> But I dont understand why
>>>
>>> . I don't think it makes
sense to refer to an ontology as being
>>> open (or not).
>>>
>>>
>>> why not?
>>
>> Well, what would it mean to say that a Word document
was 'open'? An
>> ontology is a (document consisting of) a collection of
formal
>> sentences. You can read the document: how much more
'open' can it get?
>
>so why does it make sense to refer to a piece of code as being
open (or
>not)? well, what would it mean to say that a piece of code
was 'open'?
That you can read it, exactly. In contrast to
most bought software, where what you get is not
the code in readable form, but a compiled
executable, which you can run but NOT read.
>a piece of code is a (document consisting of) a collection of
statements
>in a programming language. you can
read/parse/compile/execute the
>document: how much more 'open' can it get? if you *can* read
it, it
>can't pobably get more open (unless 'open' implies some sort of
licence
>for modification, redistribution, etc., so that beng able to read
a
>document would not be all one could do with open documents).
but what
>if you can't? you know it is there, you know people use it,
but you
>can't read it, unless you pay, or unless you're appropriately
employed.
And then its not open source. Its the source that
is open, not the code. But this distinction
doesnt apply to ontologies since (AFAIK) they
don't get compiled to executables.
Pat
>
>i don't think it makes sense to deny that an ontology could be
>meaningfully called 'open' (or not).
>
>vQ
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
>Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
>Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC
(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home
40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416
office
Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax
FL
32502
(850)291 0667 cell
http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us
http://www.flickr.com/pathayes/collections
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
Paola Di Maio
School of IT
www.mfu.ac.th
*********************************************
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC
(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home
40 South Alcaniz St.
(850)202 4416 office
Pensacola
(850)202 4440 fax
FL 32502
(850)291 0667 cell
http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us
http://www.flickr.com/pathayes/collections
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01)
|