Paola, (01)
paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx schrieb:
> However a wiki is, in my view, still primarily a 'repository', not an
> 'ontology' (02)
wiki is not an ontology but it can be used to create one. And not only
in the sense that you describe the ontology on wiki pages (by copying
and pasting there contents of an owl file for example). There already
exist semantic wikis that allow one to define relationships between
concepts by giving a type to a link. And there's more you can do in such
a wiki. (03)
Jakub (04)
> As such, I am interested in understanding the relationship between the
> architecture of a respository (say, a wiki type of tool) and the ontology
> itself (the repository independent part of the ontology, vocabularies,
> relationships and concepts, for example)
> In particular, I am interested in hearing about how a repository
> architecture may, or may not, meet the formalization requirements and how it
> may or may not influence the contents of the ontology itself
>
> PDM
> (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (06)
|