Paolo, (01)
I think you may find Barry's paper - which was referred to at the beginning
of the discussion useful. (02)
http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/persistence.pdf (03)
Chris (04)
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontolog-forum-
>bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Smith, Barry
>Sent: 10 June 2007 14:36
>To: [ontolog-forum] ; [ontolog-forum]
>Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Two ontologies that are inconsistent
>butbothneeded
>
>At 06:08 AM 6/10/2007, paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>sorry Chris if my comment is out of place
>>
>>In my statement I adopted a generic, broad definiton of continuant
>>vs occurent (continuant being a phenomenon that repeats itself
>>without a time dependency, as opposted to occurrent that happens as
>>one off event),
>
>I think that you have misunderstood the distinction.
>How do you define 'phenomenon'?
>BS
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
>Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
>Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.13/842 - Release Date: 09/06/2007
>10:46
> (05)
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.13/842 - Release Date: 09/06/2007
10:46 (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (07)
|