[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Two ontologies that are inconsistent butbothneeded

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Smith, Barry" <phismith@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:35:56 -0400
Message-id: <20070610134534.CJOD28396.mta16.adelphia.net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
At 06:08 AM 6/10/2007, paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>sorry Chris if my comment is out of place
>In my statement I adopted a generic, broad definiton of continuant 
>vs occurent (continuant being a phenomenon that repeats itself 
>without a time dependency, as opposted to occurrent that happens as 
>one off event),    (01)

I think that you have misunderstood the distinction.
How do you define 'phenomenon'?
BS     (02)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (03)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>