Hi Deb, (01)
I agree that eventually ontologies will
better describe pictures; however, the next step
in the evolution of semantics involves developing
tools with the ability to denote/connote phrases,
within given domains/contexts. (02)
Mike Brenner (03)
Deborah MacPherson wrote:
> Why does it have to be a word? Why cant it be a drawing instead? An
> unlabeled map, or labels of ontology specific words could turn on and off.
>
> By drawing I mean the full extent of one universal view governed by one
> ontology. Another area, another ontology, a different drawing. (04)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (05)
|