ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Defining Concept

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Lesh, Kathryn A." <klesh@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:10:41 -0500
Message-id: <97BFCF6E1DCA934CAC0A485A8CD5B940020A76@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
You may want to look at Barry Smith's paper presented at KR-Med 2006.
http://ontology.buffalo.edu/bfo/Terminology_for_Ontologies.pdf    (01)

FOIS 2006 also had similar presentations.    (02)

Kathy Lesh     (03)

-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles D
Turnitsa
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 3:21 PM
To: [ontolog-forum] 
Subject: [ontolog-forum] Defining Concept    (04)

Hello,    (05)

 I realize that this is not necessarily the most salient topic for this
forum, but all of the field experts whose opinion I would trust are
here,
so I'll take advantage.    (06)

 I have been working for a couple of years now in the area of
ontological
representation and ontological modeling, and I have a component based
theory that I use for my work.  It is one of the pieces of my PhD work,
and
serves a couple of useful purposes for projects I work on.  The model
takes
the approach of having a taxonomy, with entities and relationships, to
model the knowledge and process of a domain - and to show semantic
relations between entities (other than subsumption relationships) where
appropriate.  The two added components that I have been working on are
rules formalizing the application of those semantic relations, and a
way to
model the meaning of an entity by trying to capture its aspects, which
I
have referred to as concepts.    (07)

By concepts, here I mean a universal, non-divisible idea.  This
"concept"
when combined with others forms the definition of an entity.    (08)

The problem I have is that the word Concept is much too overloaded in
our
community, so I am frequently at a loss to get past assumptions about
its
definition.  One of my possible solutions is to use the word Aspect
instead, but I don't want to clear up one problem by starting another.    (09)

Any suggestions or observations?    (010)

Chuck    (011)


Charles Turnitsa
Project Scientist
Virginia Modeling, Analysis & Simulation Center
Old Dominion University Research Foundation
7000 College Drive
Suffolk, Virginia 23435
(757) 638-6315 (voice)
(757) 686-6214 (fax)
cturnits@xxxxxxx    (012)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (013)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (014)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>