ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Defining Concept

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Horning, Jim" <Jim.Horning@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:13:46 -0800
Message-id: <07DE34877A2D084F872D43939AE59DC06C8A37@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Aspect was the word that sprang to mind, even before I read that you
were considering it.  In another context (formal specification of
software), I have also used Trait.    (01)

Jim H.    (02)

-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles D
Turnitsa
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 12:21 PM
To: [ontolog-forum] 
Subject: [ontolog-forum] Defining Concept    (03)

Hello,    (04)

 I realize that this is not necessarily the most salient topic for this
forum, but all of the field experts whose opinion I would trust are
here,
so I'll take advantage.    (05)

 I have been working for a couple of years now in the area of
ontological
representation and ontological modeling, and I have a component based
theory that I use for my work.  It is one of the pieces of my PhD work,
and
serves a couple of useful purposes for projects I work on.  The model
takes
the approach of having a taxonomy, with entities and relationships, to
model the knowledge and process of a domain - and to show semantic
relations between entities (other than subsumption relationships) where
appropriate.  The two added components that I have been working on are
rules formalizing the application of those semantic relations, and a way
to
model the meaning of an entity by trying to capture its aspects, which I
have referred to as concepts.    (06)

By concepts, here I mean a universal, non-divisible idea.  This
"concept"
when combined with others forms the definition of an entity.    (07)

The problem I have is that the word Concept is much too overloaded in
our
community, so I am frequently at a loss to get past assumptions about
its
definition.  One of my possible solutions is to use the word Aspect
instead, but I don't want to clear up one problem by starting another.    (08)

Any suggestions or observations?    (09)

Chuck    (010)


Charles Turnitsa
Project Scientist
Virginia Modeling, Analysis & Simulation Center
Old Dominion University Research Foundation
7000 College Drive
Suffolk, Virginia 23435
(757) 638-6315 (voice)
(757) 686-6214 (fax)
cturnits@xxxxxxx    (011)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (012)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (013)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>