The communiqué is fine as a starting point. Some comments and ideas for
improving and evolving it. (01)
* It is difficult to read this and glean the 1-3 really key point. For example,
----the benefits of a shared UO are not clear,
----nor is the emphasis on articulating the similarities and differences and
inter-relationships.
It is all there, but not highlighted very well. (02)
* It suffers from the fact that no-one had a chance to look it over in the
large, we mostly focused on each statement on its own, or in context of 1-2
others nearby.
It has some stylistic problems, easily fixed by some word-smithing.
The order of points is fine in the large, but a clear story does not
really emerge. (03)
* It comes across a bit like motherhood, which may reflect that fact that there
was not that much that we could all actually agree on. To address this, it may
be good to clearly state the very important points of DIS-agreement, and some
pros/cons on the issues. (04)
Mike (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uos-convene/
To Post: mailto:uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/uos-convene/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpperOntologySummit (06)
|