uos-convene
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [uos-convene] requested comment on the communique

To: Upper Ontology Summit convention <uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "John A. Bateman" <bateman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:17:45 +0100
Message-id: <44174109.80705@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[Adam]    (01)

> Rephrase [6] 
 >
> Candidate conceptual building blocks can now be found in
> several upper ontologies, reflecting decades of research and
> development. 
 >
 > as [6]
 >
> Several candidate upper ontologies are available,
> reflecting decades of research and development.    (02)

Clarification: the point of the 'building blocks'
was precisely to get around and away from
'monolithic' ontologies. The *candidate*
building blocks should include theories
of time, of participation, of constitution, etc.
rather than a single ontology.    (03)

> Those that are not currently publicly available should be made so.    (04)

Nice. But enforceable?    (05)

John.    (06)


 _________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uos-convene/
To Post: mailto:uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/uos-convene/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpperOntologySummit    (07)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>