uom-ontology-std
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [uom-ontology-std] UoM ontology standard - a proposed programof work

To: "uom-ontology-std" <uom-ontology-std@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Rijgersberg, Hajo" <Hajo.Rijgersberg@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:27:40 +0200
Message-id: <81FED4D03D7F594E8CB22C6F42E6DA850177111B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I believe it was attached, but just to be sure I'll try once again.
Thanks.     (01)

-----Original Message-----
From: uom-ontology-std-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:uom-ontology-std-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mitch
Kokar
Sent: 16 July 2009 19:41
To: edbark@xxxxxxxx; uom-ontology-std
Subject: Re: [uom-ontology-std] UoM ontology standard - a proposed
programof work    (02)

It looks to me like Hajo is pasting the file into Outlook, rather than
attaching it. Just a guess.    (03)

==Mitch    (04)

On Jul 16, 2009, at 1:29 PM, Ed Barkmeyer wrote:    (05)

> Mike Bennett wrote:
>> Same here on Thunderbird. ...
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> Mitch Kokar wrote:
>>> Unfortunately, my MAC does not think so and I cannot read it at all.
>>> It shows an attachment called winmail.dat. I think Pat
>
> Hmm.  I'm using Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 on a PC and I can see the PDF 
> just fine.  When I look at the email source, I see a multipart message    (06)

> in which the interesting part begins:
>  Content-Type: application/octet-stream;  
> name="Rijgersberg-H-Top-J-Wigham-M-Ontology-of-units-of-measure.pdf"
> Content-Disposition: attachment;
>  filename="Rijgersberg-H-Top-J-Wigham-M-Ontology-of-units-of-
> measure.pdf"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
>
> It is, however, possible that my IMAP server has decoded the Outlook 
> form before storing its version.
>
> But it would be much better if Hajo could just upload to a wiki.
>
> -Ed
>
> -- 
> Edward J. Barkmeyer                        Email: edbark@xxxxxxxx
> National Institute of Standards & Technology Manufacturing Systems 
> Integration Division
> 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8263                Tel: +1 301-975-3528
> Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8263                FAX: +1 301-975-4694
>
> "The opinions expressed above do not reflect consensus of NIST,  and 
> have not been reviewed by any Government authority."
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uom-ontology-std/
> Subscribe: mailto:uom-ontology-std-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Config/Unsubscribe: 
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/uom-ontology-std/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UoM/
> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UoM_Ontology_Standard
>    (07)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uom-ontology-std/
Subscribe: mailto:uom-ontology-std-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/uom-ontology-std/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UoM/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UoM_Ontology_Standard    (08)

Attachment: Rijgersberg-H-Top-J-Wigham-M-Ontology-of-units-of-measure.pdf
Description: Rijgersberg-H-Top-J-Wigham-M-Ontology-of-units-of-measure.pdf


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uom-ontology-std/  
Subscribe: mailto:uom-ontology-std-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/uom-ontology-std/  
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UoM/  
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UoM_Ontology_Standard    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>