Re: [uom-ontology-std] UoM ontology standard - a proposed program of wor

[Evan Wallace <ewallace@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

A number of folks have suggested using Protege for OWL, but haven't 
mentioned which one.
Are we talking about Protege 3.x or Protege 4.x?  A related question 
would be are we targeting
OWL 1 or OWL 2?  I would suggest OWL 2.  The core documents are already 
at Candidate
Recommendation stage, and tools like Protege 4 and Pellet already 
provide pretty good OWL 2
support.    (01)

-Evan    (02)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uom-ontology-std/  
Subscribe: mailto:uom-ontology-std-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/uom-ontology-std/  
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UoM/  
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UoM_Ontology_Standard    (03)