ontology-summit
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontology-summit] Ontology Summit 2013

To: "steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ontology Summit 2013 discussion <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: miniaoui asma <min_asma@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 22:28:26 +0000 (GMT)
Message-id: <1355005706.55584.YahooMailNeo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hello,
I think that the first thing to do to is determine what we mean by “Evaluation”. In Literature, many terms are used; sometimes have the same, different or overlapping meanings. Our start point should be explaining each one in order to have a narrow focus and to use the same “terms” during discussions to avoid ambiguity
  • Ontology Evaluation
  • Ontology Validation
  • Ontology Verification
  • Ontology Selection
  • Ontology Ranking
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minyaoui Asma

De : Steve Ray Consulting <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
À : 'Ontology Summit 2013 discussion' <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Envoyé le : Vendredi 7 décembre 2012 21h12
Objet : Re: [ontology-summit] Ontology Summit 2013

I agree with the need to include the architecture and system design (and the methodologies for defining such, such as TOGAF) in the development of an ontology. However:
 
1.    That’s one reason that ontology *evaluation* is a more focused topic, while ontology *development and evaluation* will grow beyond the time constraints of the summit
2.    We don’t need to include everything in the *title* of the summit. We can describe the scope etc. in the introduction and track descriptions.
 
-       Steve
 
 
From: ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Todd J Schneider
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 12:05 PM
To: Ontology Summit 2013 discussion
Cc: ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] Ontology Summit 2013
 
John, Amanda, Michael,

Should consideration be given to injecting TOGAF
into the summit structure?

Todd

Inactive hide details for John F Sowa ---12/07/2012 11:29:06 AM---On 12/6/2012 11:47 PM, Michael Gruninger wrote: >
 "Ontology EJohn F Sowa ---12/07/2012 11:29:06 AM---On 12/6/2012 11:47 PM, Michael Gruninger wrote: > "Ontology Evaluation Across the Ontology Lifecycle

From: John F Sowa <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 12/07/2012 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] Ontology Summit 2013
Sent by: ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




On 12/6/2012 11:47 PM, Michael Gruninger wrote:
> "Ontology Evaluation Across the Ontology Lifecycle"

That's an important topic.  But the lifecycle of an ontology is
co-extensive with the lifecycle of any application or system that
uses or is based on that ontology.

This morning, I sent replies to two email lists that most people
on this list subscribe to.

 1. To Nancy W. on IAOA, I made the point that you can't separate
    the ontology of a system from its architecture or design.

 2. To Rich C. on Ontolog Forum:  "Imagine an IT department that had
    one group doing the architecture, a second group doing the design,
    a third group doing the ontology, and a fourth group doing the
    implementation."

Amanda responded,
> Sadly, John, some of us don't have to imagine this; we can remember it!

I would relate that point to evaluation:  a critical issue in a good
ontology is its accuracy in reflecting the design and/or architecture
of the system.

There are aspects and modules that could be distinguished.  For
example, the complete ontology of a system might combine multiple
modules or microtheories.  But the complete ontology of a system
and its complete architecture must be closely coordinated.

Any evaluation of an ontology must address these issues.

John

_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/   
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2013/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2013 
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2793 / Virus Database: 2634/5942 - Release Date: 12/06/12


_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ 
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2013/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2013 
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/



_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/   
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2013/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2013  
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/     (01)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>