Yes, I think I have – see http://gov.aol.com/2011/12/29/lessons-from-armys-weapon-systems-handbook-and-galls-law/ and http://semanticommunity.info/@api/deki/files/15678/=BrandNiemann11092011.pptx From: ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of AzamatAbdoullaev
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 12:07 PM
To: Ontology Summit 2012 discussion
Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] [BigSystemsandSystemsEngineering]Systemofsystems I still wonder if we have developed the distinction criteria for the complex systems and the systems of systems. ----- Original Message ----- Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 9:56 PM Subject: Re: [ontology-summit][BigSystemsandSystemsEngineering]Systemofsystems Yuriy:
Because the name of this track is Big Systems and Systems Engineering this topic fits under the topic of mathematics (a very big system).
However, engineering in general is a bit different and systems engineering is even more different.
Engineering is the act of applying mathematics and scientific principles to the solution of practical problems.
So, math is a tool used by engineers to solve problems.
Then there are systems science and metasystems methodology that set the context for the application of systems engineering.
There is little or no magic involved in these well defined approaches and processes for designing, developing, deploying and operating large-scale systems.
However, as Arthur C. Clarke detailed in his three laws, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
In my mind we are discussing a very advanced technology that integrates large stores of data, information and technology.
It is not magic.
Take care and have fun,
Joe 2012/2/3 Yuriy Milov <qdone@xxxxxxxxxx> If a () system of () systems exists then a (very (simple)) system is still a system of (very (very (simple))) system. It's amaizing to know a very simple system which demonstrates very complex behavior. This is a fantastic gift. We do not deserv it - but we have it! :) We could think that the natural numbers (1,2,3,4,5,6,7.. so on) is simple. Are we sure? Let's choose a natural number n1 (free, spontaneously, without any reasons - just any of natural numbers) and then let's choose again any natural number n2 (free, spontaneously, without any reasons - just any of natural numbers). The more freedom of choice we have - the more chances that n2>n1 Absolute freedom of choice makes n2>n1 guaranteed The reason of this is that there is no a biggest natural number (that is also an amazing fact, by the way) We (people) are finite (in space and time) pretty simple entities. How can we understand infinity? The answer is - because ae are able to play with a freedom of choice - thanks for the great gift - the natural numbers :) The logistic equations and cellular automata are magic wands whaich transform complex system of systems in a simple set 1,2,3 and so on :) ----- Original Message ----- Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 3:29 AM Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] [BigSystemsandSystemsEngineering]Systemofsystems The logistic equation is a math model of the behavior of a living system.
A very simple system can demonstrate very complex behavior.
In my view this is another example of general systems theory (GST) where a specific branch of science was generalized into mathematics and applied in many places.
However, this is behavior of a simple system, not a system of systems or an industrial system.
Have fun,
Joe On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Yuriy Milov <qdone@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi Jack,
I think the metod is to follow the cascade of bifurcation which has the
universal mesure (a sort of the delta number which can be got from
experiment/experience)
The magics here is our ability to distinguish the related and unrelated
events - where the bifurcated branchs (splitted paths) belongs one tree
(one way)
Sorry if it is too vague methafora - I do some urgent job right now
Yuri
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
--
Joe Simpson
Sent From My DROID!!
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
|
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (01)
|