ontology-summit
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontology-summit] An example of the worth of ontology development

To: Ontology Summit 2011 discussion <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Arun <arun@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:32:01 -0500
Message-id: <4D6EA941.30907@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Does anyone have any tools that go from raw data to produce Ontologies 
as output or even proto-ontologies as outputs that humans can then edit 
and refine?    (01)

On 3/2/11 12:50 PM, Jack Ring wrote:
> Quite so.
> That's why helping them understand their enterprise as a system, hopefully an 
>intelligent system, gives them the perspective to grok the strange 
>distinctions that ontologists need to make.
> This starts with a little semantic modeling; then activity modeling of the 
>problematic situation (customers, markets, competitors, etc., and Their  
>customers, markets, competitors, etc.,); then formulating an intervention 
>strategy for serving unmet, even unrecognized, market needs better than can 
>competitors and rivals; then design/architecture of To Be enterprise; then
> teasing out the infrastructure and modularization. All this must precede the 
>development on ontology (because ontology is a major facet of infrastructure).
>
> Ways of accomplishing intelligent enterprise systems architecting and 
>engineering are being evovled.
>
> Unfortunately the NOISE created by Business Process Management, Knowledge 
>Management, Business Rules management, Enterprise Architecture Frameworks (for 
>paint-by-numbers, i.e., ignorant, enterprises), etc., is precluding rapid 
>development of this capability.
>
> Meanwhile, there are already places that have recognized the need for 
>intelligent infrastructure. These are the current  market targets for ontology 
>insertion. In general, it is any enterprise or market wherein He Who Learns 
>Fastest Wins. Specific examples are Military Intelligence, Business 
>Intelligence, Conference Management (evolving to social network interlocutor), 
>Learning Management (as modern education of youth is finally freed from 
>government intervention), and Autonomous System engagement management. 
>Personalized, Molecular-level medicine may become the Killer App.
>
> Make sense?
>
> On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:10 AM, John F. Sowa wrote:
>
>> Jack and Mike,
>>
>> I agree with that point, but I'd like to add some qualifications:
>>
>> JR
>>> The primary purpose of a semantic model is to facilitate knowledge
>>> exchange and choice making in a gaggle of humans in hopes of
>>> morphing the gaggle into a system. A key usage is to inform the
>>> development of an executable ontology, e.g., application software,
>>> for automation of information flow and decision. Another key purpose
>>> is to provide a basis for objective assessment of enterprise
>>> situation (aka evidence-based management).
>> MU
>>> Yes, this is the kind of thing I'm after.
>> The primary qualification is that the "gaggle of humans" can only
>> agree on what they understand.  The people who work in a field
>> can all agree that a list of familiar words, as documented in
>> their familiar texts, cover their familiar subject matter.
>>
>> But when ontologists start to axiomatize those terms in some
>> arcane notation based on some arcane distinctions about
>> endurants, perdurants, continuants, etc., all bets are off.
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
>> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
>> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
>> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
>> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>    (02)


-- 
WARNING: THIS EMAIL IS COVERED BY THE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS PRIVACY ACT, 18 
U.S.C. § 2510-2521 AND IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED.  THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN 
THIS MESSAGE AND THE ATTACHMENT, IF ANY, IS EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER 
APPLICABLE LAW.    (03)


_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/   
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011  
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/     (04)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>