On 2/2/2011 11:10 AM, Yuriy Milov wrote:
> We don't understand the nature of the mouse brain but a chess computer wins
> granmasters. (01)
Yes, but there are only two kinds of things that computers do better
than humans (or even birds and mammals): storing large volumes of
data exactly and computational things like arithmetic and chess. (02)
For go, the computational methods can beat amateurs, but not the
lowest level of go masters. That's because humans use perceptual
mechanisms that no computer today can come close to matching. (03)
Robots can do extremely precise detail, but they can't do things that
are trivial for humans and other animals: e.g., wash dishes the way
people do or build a bird's nest the way birds do. (04)
> Court trials is just a textual games by clear rules where a judge is similar
> to a game server, and if legal dusputes go online it would be a great
> Elevator Pitch. (05)
Please go do your homework on the state of the art of AI today. (06)
An elevator pitch for something that nobody knows how to do
would be worthless. (07)
John (08)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (09)
|