On 1/31/2011 10:07 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> Until there are production quality tools and a production quality
> framework that allows a developer to build applications faster and more
> reliably using ontologies, I just don't see how ontology gets out of the
> academic world. (01)
I agree. (02)
> I think that I am looking for a framework that lets me specify a lattice
> of ontologies with their interfaces and a description of the SOA in
> terms of inputs and desired flows and outputs and have the engine make
> it fly. (03)
I have been hoping that the SIO and OOR groups could develop something
along those lines. See slides 61 to 80 of (04)
http://www.jfsowa.com/talks/iss.pdf (05)
But things aren't likely to progress very fast without some funding. (06)
JFS
>> A mining company used mules to pull ore out of their mines because
>> they wanted to avoid sparks that might trigger an explosion. To
>> keep track of their mules, they assigned them employee numbers.
>> When they automated their databases, they added an extra option
>> to the sex field: Male, Female, or Mule. (07)
RW
> I suppose that the HR department had a few requests to change the gender
> definitions on a human to "Mule". (08)
In 1978, people weren't as sensitive about such things. (09)
John (010)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (011)
|