Thanks you for the feedback, John. I'll respond in-line below. =ppy
On 3/18/07, John F. Sowa <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [JS] I agree with Mike Uschold:
> > [MU] I find that the survey is very confusing.
[ppy] I agree too, somewhat ... but hopefully, my response to Mike
would help some. (03)
> [JS] Those entries could be filled out at many levels of detail.
> For most of them, all I could say is something vague like
> "many". It would be impossible to make it clear without
> writing a long essay on the topic. (04)
[ppy] Long essays are welcomed. The only request would be: please
help by summarizing it in 3~5 bullet points at the top of it (which I
just added to the survey remarks.) (05)
> [JS] What is the purpose of the questionnaire? Who is going
> to do what with it? And why?
> I'm not against the idea of a questionnaire. But before
> sending it out, it's important to have a clear idea of
> what is going to be done with the answers.
> What is the purpose?
> John (06)
[ppy] I have made my best attempt to explain it clearly at the
beginning of the survey (between the title and the first question.) (07)
I guess my earlier answer to Paola's question
may help too. (08)
I look forward to receiving your response. (09)
Thanks & regards. =ppy
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2007/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (011)