I find that the survey is very confusing.
It took a while to figure out what was being asked for, and I'm still
not exactly sure. (01)
You need to give an example of a section filled out. (02)
Is a given individual likley to fill out all 8? Just one or two? What
would be an example of the kinds of entries that one might find. (03)
Maybe it's just me... but I find this to be too confusing for me to want
to forward it to my Boeing colleagues. (04)
Mike (05)
==========================
Michael Uschold
M&CT, Phantom Works
425 373-2845
michael.f.uschold@xxxxxxxxxx
========================== (06)
----------------------------------------------------
COOL TIP: to skip the phone menu tree and get a human on the phone, go
to: http://gethuman.com/tips.html (07)
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter P. Yim [mailto:peter.yim@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 1:26 AM
To: ontolog-invitation@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ontology Summit Forum
Subject: [ontology-summit] Ontology Summit 2007 Survey (08)
Re: Ontology Summit 2007 - Ontology, Taxonomy, Folksonomy:
Understanding the Distinctions (09)
As part of the ongoing "Ontology Summit 2007" initiative, we are making
an attempt to reach out to everyone (in research, applications and
everything in between) who profess in developing or facilitating the
evolution of "ontologies" and structures that help model semantics here. (010)
We need your input, from the perspective of your constituency
(communities or sub-communities that applies the science, art and
engineering of ontology), telling us what "ontology" and other
"ontology-related terms" mean to you. We also want you to tell us
about representative ontological (or related) artifacts in your
constituency. (011)
With your input, we hope to clarify what everyone (coming from different
constituency) mean when they use the term "ontology" or when they refer
to related semantic structures; and with that, help everyone better
understand the different types of "ontologies" or "semantic structures"
that fall broadly within the spectrum. By doing so, the research,
development and Internet communities would, hopefully, have a better way
of comparing, combining and mapping ontologies to one another. (012)
I invite you to spend a few minutes and complete the online survey for
this joint effort. You can find it at:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/survey/summit72.html (013)
Your input is very important to the endeavor. Please pass this
invitation along to colleagues of your who are in a position to provide
meaningful input on the matter as well. (014)
Thanks in advance. =ppy (015)
Peter P. Yim, Co-convener, Ontolog (016)
on behalf of the
Ontology Summit 2007 organizing committee
-- (017)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2007/
Community Wiki:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (018)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2007/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (019)
|