|From:||Ali H <asaegyn@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Wed, 8 Oct 2014 12:35:27 -0400|
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Matthew West <dr.matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
While I can see why one might identify (b) as referring "robotics", I think that is too narrow an interpretation.
Perhaps my reading of Smith is too literal, but anything situated in our world is ultimately mechanical (or material). To me, this means that any system that is capable of interpreting or reasoning which an ontology is in the set of things as described by (b).
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|