|From:||Steven Ericsson-Zenith <steven@xxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:32:35 -0700|
My first observation must simply be that while epistemology may indeed include a concern for the correspondence theory of "truth," ontology, in its classic sense, is entirely unconcerned with epistemology. Note that there is a necessary distinction between ontology and speaking about the world with some epistemology in mind.
As far as I can tell, Brian Smith is using the term in the local sense. In other words the corrupt KR engineering form of "ontology" is a reference to some schema design .
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Ali H <asaegyn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology vs KR, Barkmeyer, Edward J|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Massive Ontology Interface, Richard H. McCullough|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology vs KR, Ali H|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology vs KR, Ali H|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|