|
On 1/19/2014 3:50 AM, K Goodier wrote:
Friends,
Also in the federal context in the U.S., we promote the
protection of personally identifiable information as defined in
NIST Special Publication 800-22. So even if you consent to the
collection of PII, at least in this context, you have a right to
expect some safeguarding of your personally identifiable data.
I am part of a group that discusses these issues in the public
federal big data meet up.
I would think that we also need some
legislature to go along with privacy definitions. Else each state,
corporation, municipality or museum will have their own
guidelines.
Further, we need definitions that cover law enforcement policies.
Imagine an officer stops you for running a red light.
1. He asks for your driver's license and registration and is in
the process of citing you for a traffic violation.
2. Next he asks politely if he can see your phone to see your
phone. You refuse, citing the need for a warrant.
3. He asks you to step out of the car and searches you, taking
your phone.
4. He tries to search the phone but stops to ask you for your
password(s). You give it to him.
5. He looks at all your contacts, sent text messages and sees that
you once communicated with a felon who is now in a gang.
6. He requests a dispatch to search your house as your are
suspected of being in a gang.
How do we control the shenanigans without ring-fencing the limits
of privacy for each of the contexts above? How does a privacy
definition vary for school students? What about for trade school
students where there is no "in loco parentis"? This sounds
like an opportunity for an ontology that defines relations that
have been put into force for each of the states. Unless that is,
we have a working Federal definition.
-John Bottoms
FirstStar Systems
Concord, MA USA
On 1/15/14 2:51 PM, Duane Nickull
wrote:
It is an invasion of privacy if you do not consent to
have your data used as such. In most cases, people
willingly signed over those rights. Check the ToS on
Facebook for example.
Secondly, opting in is not the issue, opting out is.
There is also the concept of context and traverse
ability. I may have your weight recorded but in a manner
where it is not directly attributable to you without
further correlation. Cookies are a good example of this.
Duane Nickull
***********************************
Technoracle Advanced Systems Inc.
Consulting and Contracting; Proven Results!
i. Neo4J, PDF, Java, LiveCycle ES, Flex, AIR, CQ5
& Mobile
t. @duanenickull
+1
Privacy is self-calibration of one's vulnerability on or
offline.
"You" not "Them" decide to lock your front-door at night, for
instance.
Any situation in which "You" aren't the calibrator of "Your"
vulnerability is an invasion of privacy.
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
|
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|