Re: [ontolog-forum] Dennett on the Darwinism of Memes

[as ha <ontopaedia@xxxxxxxxx>]

 

It looks ontologists looking for a new kind of God, OoE, Ontology of Everything: http://www.slideshare.net/ashabook/encyclopedic-intelligence

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Hassan Aït-Kaci <hassanaitkaci@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 4/25/2013 6:39 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:

The basic scientific argument against the existence of God is that there is absolutely no observational evidence for the existence of a God, nor any reason to hypothesise such an entity in order to explain anything that is observable. A very straightforward application of Occam's principle then suffices. Of course this is not a *proof*, but it is a sound *scientific* argument. Proofs are irrelevant here. There is no proof that the flying spaghetti monster does not exist, but that does not shake the faith of the true Pastafarian.

Pat

+1

--
-hak

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
 

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (01)