|To:||doug@xxxxxxxxxx, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|From:||William Frank <williamf.frank@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:10:36 -0400|
"all things shall??? be classified". See below.|
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:15 PM, doug foxvog <doug@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:--
On Wed, September 26, 2012 08:53, Andries van Renssen wrote:
Try to imagine a thing you could not classify at all. I just can't. Please describe such a thing you have imagined to me.
Is it a living thing, or an inaimate thing? Won't you be able to tell at some point, if not yet? Is it a solid or a gas or a liquid or a combination? Is it possible that you can recognize it as a thing, any yet are, in principle, not able to tell what kind of thing it is?
here is a thing. How do you know it is one thing, and not two, or a half a thing?
What does this tell you about this "rule."
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Universal Basic Semantic Structures, doug foxvog|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Universal Basic Semantic Structures, Rich Cooper|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Universal Basic Semantic Structures, doug foxvog|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Universal Basic Semantic Structures, John F Sowa|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|