[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] RDF vs. EAR

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Duane Nickull <duane@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:15:22 -0800
Message-id: <CB02D623.AC60%duane@xxxxxxxxxxx>

On 11-12-05 5:45 PM, "Kingsley Idehen" <kidehen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:    (01)

>Yes, but for bootstrap at InterWeb scale, it hasn't worked. Today's
>developer aren't ready to absorb the cost of parser development
>especially in the Open Source era where purchasing commercial quality
>grade libraries isn't the preferred options. People really like the
>"Free" part of the "Freedom" aspect of Open Source. Basically, they want
>the "Free Beer" and that's where XML parser problems start.    (02)

DN: I have to disagree with this.  I've worked in the commercial software
industry since XML was a recommendation in 1998 and have worked on
numerous solutions around B2B.   The most widely used XML parsers are
FOSS.  Xerces, JDOM et al for Java are driving most large businesses XML
parsing requirements. Almost every language has good XML capabilities.    (03)

The main cost of XML interchange is mapping the instance data to the
business services based on its' semantics.    (04)

_    (05)

Principal Data Architect &
Adobe LiveCycle ES Consultant Services
Blog | http://technoracle.blogspot.com
Twitter | @duanechaos    (06)

>    (07)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (08)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>