John,
Thanks for this.
Seems to me that this is a very small test of the marketplace.
Are you saying that the incidence of error will not be a factor in the value
proposition that customers will find compelling?
What is your attitude toward ontologies with an error rate of 1 per 1000
assertions?
Jack (01)
On Dec 17, 2010, at 7:51 AM, John F. Sowa wrote: (02)
> On 12/17/2010 9:24 AM, Jack Ring wrote:
>> What leads you to believe that prospects for ontologies will be as naive and
>tolerant?
>
> The current set of ontologies that people have been writing and using.
>
> John
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (03)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (04)
|