John,
That's my favorite example, as well.
OBTW, the burgeoning attention to cybersecurity is going to shine a rather
intense spotlight on this primary culprit.
But that is past/present tense.
What leads you to believe that prospects for ontologies will be as naive and
tolerant?
Jack (01)
On Dec 16, 2010, at 8:46 PM, John F. Sowa wrote: (02)
> On 12/16/2010 5:22 PM, Jack Ring wrote:
>> What leads you to believe that customers will tolerate latent
>> errors in ontologies?
>
> The most convincing proof that customers tolerate latent (or even
> blatant) errors is Microsoft Windows.
>
> John
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (03)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (04)
|