Agreed; applying
knowledge about how to manage quality of a step and repeat process makes sense,
but only to another step and repeat process. Software is definitely not
that, despite six decades of trying to do it more reliably and efficiently.
It’s still very much an individual programmer working on a poorly
specified problem and finding ways to get acceptable results.
-Rich
Sincerely,
Rich Cooper
EnglishLogicKernel.com
Rich AT
EnglishLogicKernel DOT com
9 4 9 \ 5 2 5 - 5 7 1 2
On 12/16/2010 5:22 PM,
Jack Ring wrote:
On Dec 16, 2010, at 12:43
AM, Matthew West wrote:
It is an eloquent
description of why software, after 40 years of Software Engineering, is still
the lousiest artifact ever devised by mankind.
A simple lack of belief
in and dedication to Zero Defects(tm).
Jack,
Zero defects is about producing *the same thing* repeatedly and getting the
same result ... i.e. Manufacturing. In software system development, almost
nothing is ever produced more than once so let's not compare producing bolts
with producing ERP systems. I agree that as Larry Johnson is fond of saying,
'Scientists stand on each others shoulders, and software engineers stand on
each others toes' so vast improvements can be made - but that still doesn't
mean Zero defects as in the Mfg industry makes sense wrt software engineering.
Cheers,
David
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
Principal Consultant
TopQuadrant, Inc.
US Phone +1 336-283-0606
UK Mobile +44 7788 561308