ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Quality

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Jack Ring <jring7@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:00:54 -0700
Message-id: <6F2DA8AE-91B2-4DB3-8CDB-01849194CF61@xxxxxxxxx>
Rich,
That was John Sowa's line.
Catch him next on Improv.    (01)

On Dec 17, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Rich Cooper wrote:    (02)

> John,
> 
> You said
> 
> "The GIGO law has not been repealed, but some people try to deodorize the
> garbage by spraying some ontology on it."
> 
> John
> 
> This is probably the wisest statement on this list in the years I have been
> following it.  
> 
> -Rich
> 
> Sincerely,
> Rich Cooper
> EnglishLogicKernel.com
> Rich AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com
> 9 4 9 \ 5 2 5 - 5 7 1 2
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John F. Sowa
> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 8:16 AM
> To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Quality
> 
> On 12/17/2010 10:54 AM, Jack Ring wrote:
>> Are you saying that the incidence of error will not be a factor
>> in the value proposition that customers will find compelling?
>> What is your attitude toward ontologies with an error rate
>> of 1 per 1000 assertions?
> 
> Errors are always a factor, but some are more serious than others.
> 
> As I'm writing this, the radio in the background had a news
> item about an investigation of hedge funds that may have used
> inside information.
> 
> The interviewer asked whether that would be a "big case",
> and the response was "Any case in which you are indicted
> is a big case for you."
> 
> I believe that a similar principle applies to ontologies.
> 
> But I would also recommend tools that can detect and avoid
> as many errors as possible.  For example, the software for
> Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) generates lattices that are
> guaranteed to be consistent.  See the FCA home page:
> 
>    http://www.upriss.org.uk/fca/fca.html
> 
> This is a convenient method for ensuring that multiple
> inheritance does not create contradictions.  But FCA only
> guarantees consistency with the data you give it.  If you
> don't give it all the relevant data, FCA can't use it.
> 
> The GIGO law has not been repealed, but some people try
> to deodorize the garbage by spraying some ontology on it.
> 
> John
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     (03)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (04)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>