ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Event Ontology

To: "'[ontolog-forum] '" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Rich Cooper" <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 18:57:29 -0700
Message-id: <20090910015833.113F9138D02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sorry to offend you again, Chris, and thank you for accepting my apology.      (01)

-Rich    (02)


Sincerely,
Rich Cooper
EnglishLogicKernel.com
Rich AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com    (03)

-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Christopher
Menzel
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 10:36 AM
To: [ontolog-forum] 
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Event Ontology    (04)

On Sep 8, 2009, at 11:56 PM, Rich Cooper wrote:
> Ravi Sharma wrote:
>
>> John, Azamat, Rich
>>
>> We have to agree that Whole is more than sum of parts such as life  
>> which generally obeys physics, chemistry etc. For example if a  
>> creature (non flying) falls down, it has to suffer consequences of  
>> acceleration due to gravity thus life may be lost but not the  
>> constituent matter. Thus in some philosophies the consciousness is  
>> the continuum that binds it all living or non-living! How will that  
>> fit into realism, nominalism or reductionism or will it be excluded  
>> by those - by limiting our understanding to living or non-living  
>> matter - who have not followed that line of reasoning?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Ravi
>
> Chris, note that Ravi took no insult because he has projected none  
> onto what I wrote.    (05)

Why on earth should he be?  He wasn't the target of the apparent insult.    (06)

> You projected my statements, especially the "You're going to insult  
> him.?" which insult he very obviously doesn't share.    (07)

Do you even know what "projection" means? You should keep your  
armchair psychologizing to yourself. For the record, I "took no  
insult" from your words either. The motivation for my reply was  
nothing other than a rather natural human response to a piece of  
sarcasm that was both uncalled for and, given your own bloviations,  
rather spectacularly ironic.  I'm willing to accept your claim that no  
insult toward Azamat was, in fact, intended.  If so, you should learn  
to choose your words more carefully.    (08)

Chris Menzel    (09)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (010)



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (011)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>