From:
ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of ravi
sharma
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009
7:05 PM
To: [ontolog-forum]
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Event
Ontology
We have to agree that Whole is more than sum of parts such as life
which generally obeys physics, chemistry etc. For example if a creature (non
flying) falls down, it has to suffer consequences of acceleration due to
gravity thus life may be lost but not the constituent matter. Thus in some
philosophies the consciousness is the continuum that binds it all living or
non-living!
What an interesting way to explain the
Indian viewpoint! I have never heard it done in a way that fits with the present
scientific knowledge so clearly and convincingly! Thanks for the vivid
description. Much better than the mysticism, funny creatures and odd names you
usually see in non Indian-born projections of the same things. You must be educated
in both eastern traditions and western science; am I correct?
-Rich
How will that fit into realism, nominalism or reductionism or will it
be excluded by those - by limiting our understanding to living or non-living
matter - who have not followed that line of reasoning?